ACS Code of Professional

ACS Code of Professional Conduct

Assessment item 1 back to top ACS Code of Professional ConductValue:15%Due Date:24-Mar-2019Return Date:12-Apr-2019Length:1000Submission method options:Alternative submission methodTaskback to top Proceed according to the following instructions. Identify an ethical issue in ONE of the following four YouTube videos: Video1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5M7ohdZ6qAVideo2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0npm9cEJBWYVideo3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBfJ07gfHycVideo4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mugeCY3vbxo Include the link to the video in the references list of your assignment.Undertake further research about the ethical issue you identified in your chosen video to assist you in analysing and discussing it in your essay.Analyse the ethical issue from the perspective of the Australian Computer Society Code of Professional Conduct.Make a recommendation on the basis of your analysis providing reasons for this recommendation.Include a Reference list at the end of your work, in the correct APA referencing style, corresponding to in-text citations. You must include at least TWO (2) quality academic references (one for each ethical perspective) from different sources. Please note that these references are in addition to those provided to you through this subject (for example, you still must reference, Reynolds textbook, the Interact subject lecture notes etc BUT these references cannot be used as one of your three quality academic references from different sources). Only include references that have been cited in the body of your assignment and ones that support what you have presented in your assignment. The word limit is 1000 words 10%. Note: Headings, citations, references and any appendices do not count towards your word limit, but quotations do. At the start of the assignment indicate in brackets the word count of your assignment excluding those items mentioned above. Rationaleback to top This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s: be able to identify ethical issues related to ICT.be able to assess the implications of ethical problems.be able to critically evaluate solutions to ethical problems.be able to analyse ethical problems from the point of view of ICT professionals using the Australian Computer Society (ACS) Code of Ethics. Marking criteria and standardsback to top CriteriaStandardsHigh Distinction (HD)Distinction (DI)Credit (CR)Pass (PS)Fail (FL)Analysis of the ethical issue using the ACS Code of Professional Conduct (Value 70%)Correctly maps the ethical issue within the video to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers).Comprehensively analyses the ethical issue from the point of view of the Code. Makes a convincing and a justifiable recommendation Demonstrates breadth & depth of understanding & has insights & awareness of the deeper, more subtle aspects of the Code.Adequately maps the ethical issue within the video to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers).The analysis properly explains the link between the ethical issue and the elements of the Code. The recommendation made is reasonable and is supported with a justification Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the Code.Makes a genuine attempt at mapping the ethical issue within the video to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers).The analysis explains to some extent the link between the ethical issue and the elements of the Code. The recommendation made makes sense and a good attempt is made to support it with a justification Demonstrates a good understanding of the Code.The ethical issue is mapped to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers) but with errors.The analysis does not explain well the link between the ethical issue and the elements of the Code. The recommendation made makes sense but is not supported with a justification Demonstrates some evidence of understanding of the Code.Incorrectly maps the ethical issue within the video to sections of the Code.The analysis of the ethical issue is not consistent with the elements of the Code. The recommendation made makes no sense Demonstrates little evidence of understanding of the Code.Writing & structure (Value 20%)Highly developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling accurate.Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling accurate.Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas. Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors.Some skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Meaning apparent, but writing style not always fluent or well organised. Grammar & spelling contains several careless errors.Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised. Grammar & spelling contains many errors.Referencing (Value 10%)Faultless referencing, including reference list and citations.High quality references.Very good referencing, including reference list and citations.High quality references.Good referencing, including reference list and citations.Good quality references.

Pssst…Are you looking for assignment help?

We have experienced native experts to complete any assignment you may have. Plagiarism Free & Great Quality. (Full Refund Provided)

<< SAVE15 >>

Place your first order with code to get 15% discount right away!

Impressive sample results