Incorrect or incomplete

Rubric for EDUC6160 Assessment 2 Supporting Communication Skills 2018 Student: Marker: FF <50% P 50% CR 65% D 75% HD 100% Criterion 1 Displays an understanding of communication development Incorrect or incomplete understanding of topic Limited understanding and explanation provided Main elements identified with sound explanation and understanding Main topic identified with a good explanation of key elements Comprehensive understanding of all vocabulary, elements and issues discussed with clear explanation /10 Criterion 2 Evidence of a theoretical understanding of the communication intervention Incorrect or incomplete understanding of topic Limited understanding and explanation provided Main elements identified with sound explanation and understanding Main topic identified with a good explanation of key elements Comprehensive understanding of all vocabulary, elements and issues discussed with clear explanation /5 Criterion 2 Evidence of the practical applications of the communication intervention on functional communication Incorrect or incomplete practical applications Limited practical applications Sound application of the main communication goals. Some illustrative examples provided Good practical applications identified and explained. Clear illustrative examples provided. Excellent practical application of the theory with clear and concise examples /5 Criterion 3 Reflection on why the communication intervention was effective with reference to the relevant literature No evidence of understanding of the main concepts and no/ limited references Limited reflection and analysis of the main issues/concepts. Clear insight to the main issue/s and referencing to core literature Good insights into the main issues based on the literature Outstanding insights based on a comprehensive understanding of the theory /5 Criterion 5 Ability to write clearly and concisely using appropriate referencing (i.e. APA referencing style). Evidence of reading beyond the core course readings provided Poor writing style. Limited referencing and many referencing errors, No additional references cited. Reasonable writing style, but could improve in structure. Contains several grammatical, spelling and/or referencing errors. Reasonable reference list Well written. Contains some grammatical, spelling and/or referencing errors. Reference list shows evidence of further reading beyond core course readings Good writing style and structure. Good use of APA referencing. Some minor writing and referencing errors. Good depth of relevance of reading An exemplary paper with logical structure. Excellent use of high quality and relevant references throughout /5 Comments: Total Points /30

Pssst…We can write an original essay just for you.

Any essay type. Any subject. We will even overcome a 6 hour deadline.

<< SAVE15 >>

Place your first order with code to get 15% discount right away!

Impressive sample results