Reasons Background And Context

Reasons Background And Context Surrounding Why The Royal Commission Was Conducted

MAA250 Ethics and Financial Services Marking Rubric Assignment 1 Trimester 2, 2018 School of Accounting, Economics and Finance Faculty of Business and Law Deakin University Page 1 of 2 Criteria Unacceptable Needs Improvement Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Part A (Up to 25 marks) 0 7.4 marks 7.5 12.4 marks 12.5 14.9 marks 15.0 17.4 marks 17.5 19.9 marks 20.0 25.0 marks Presenting the background, momentum, impetus and rationale as to why the Royal Commission was necessary, applying ethical concepts GLO1: Application of discipline Specific Knowledge Fails to address the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Lacks any depth of research Inadequate referencing Some ability to address the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Lacks the required depth of research Some but insufficient referencing Satisfactory ability to address the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Reasonably argued based on an acceptable amount of research Minimal deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Adequate referencing Good knowledge and well-articulated addressing of the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Some deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Good referencing Very good and well articulated addressing of the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Very good analysis and insight Very good referencing Excellent answering of all components of this part, addressing the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Excellent level of deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Excellent referencing Part B (Up to 25 marks) 0 7.4 marks 7.5 12.4 marks 12.5 14.9 marks 15.0 17.4 marks 17.5 19.9 marks 20.0 25.0 marks Presenting the interim findings, revelations, conflicts of interest and corporate culture surrounding the Royal Commission, applying ethical concepts GLO1: Application of discipline Specific Knowledge Fails to answer all required components of the questions relating to status, findings, COI or culture No depth / inadequate referencing Some ability to answer all required components of the questions, with insufficient depth relating to status, findings, COI or culture Lacks the required depth of research Some but insufficient referencing Satisfactory ability to articulate status, findings, COI and culture Minimal deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Adequate referencing Good knowledge around status, findings, COI and culture Some deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Good referencing Very good in relation to status, findings, COI and culture Very good referencing An excellent articulation of the status, findings, COI and culture Excellent level of deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Excellent referencing MAA250 Ethics and Financial Services Marking Rubric Assignment 1 Trimester 2, 2018 School of Accounting, Economics and Finance Faculty of Business and Law Deakin University Page 2 of 2 Criteria Unacceptable Needs Improvement Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Part C (Up to 25 marks) 0 7.4 marks 7.5 12.4 marks 12.5 14.9 marks 15.0 17.4 marks 17.5 19.9 marks 20.0 25.0 marks -Communicates a discussion relating to rewards, punishments, recommendations, and impact surrounding the Royal Commission, applying ethical concepts, from a stakeholder perspective GLO2: Communicate to inform Fails to answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Lacks any depth of research Inadequate referencing Some ability to answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Lacks the required depth of research Some but insufficient referencing Satisfactory ability to answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Minimal analysis but with adequate referencing Good knowledge answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Some deeper analysis and insight Good referencing Very good answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Sound deeper analysis Very good referencing An excellent answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Excellent deeper analysis / insight and referencing Part D (Up to 25 marks) 0 7.4 marks 7.5 12.4 marks 12.5 14.9 marks 15.0 17.4 marks 17.5 19.9 marks 20.0 25.0 marks Ethical behaviour and cross cultural application in relation to overseas / global comparisons to the Australian banking and finance sectors and the interim findings of the Royal Commission GLO8: Global Citizenship (and comparative awareness) Does not know/attempt to analyse and/or discusses diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with no references Struggles to analyse and/or discuss diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with inadequate references Satisfactorily analyses and/or discusses diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with adequate references Good analysis and/or discusses diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with good references Very good analysis and/or discusses diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with very good references Excellent analysis and/or discusses diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with excellent references Overall Score out of 100 marks N 0.0 -29.5 N 30.0 49.5 P 50.0 59.5 C 60.0 69.5 D 70.0 79.5 HD 80.0 100.0 The post reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted MAA250 Ethics and Financial Services Marking Rubric Assignment 1 Trimester 2, 2018 School of Accounting, Economics and Finance Faculty of Business and Law Deakin University Page 1 of 2 Criteria Unacceptable Needs Improvement Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Part A (Up to 25 marks) 0 7.4 marks 7.5 12.4 marks 12.5 14.9 marks 15.0 17.4 marks 17.5 19.9 marks 20.0 25.0 marks Presenting the background, momentum, impetus and rationale as to why the Royal Commission was necessary, applying ethical concepts GLO1: Application of discipline Specific Knowledge Fails to address the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Lacks any depth of research Inadequate referencing Some ability to address the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Lacks the required depth of research Some but insufficient referencing Satisfactory ability to address the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Reasonably argued based on an acceptable amount of research Minimal deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Adequate referencing Good knowledge and well-articulated addressing of the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Some deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Good referencing Very good and well articulated addressing of the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Very good analysis and insight Very good referencing Excellent answering of all components of this part, addressing the reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted Excellent level of deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Excellent referencing Part B (Up to 25 marks) 0 7.4 marks 7.5 12.4 marks 12.5 14.9 marks 15.0 17.4 marks 17.5 19.9 marks 20.0 25.0 marks Presenting the interim findings, revelations, conflicts of interest and corporate culture surrounding the Royal Commission, applying ethical concepts GLO1: Application of discipline Specific Knowledge Fails to answer all required components of the questions relating to status, findings, COI or culture No depth / inadequate referencing Some ability to answer all required components of the questions, with insufficient depth relating to status, findings, COI or culture Lacks the required depth of research Some but insufficient referencing Satisfactory ability to articulate status, findings, COI and culture Minimal deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Adequate referencing Good knowledge around status, findings, COI and culture Some deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Good referencing Very good in relation to status, findings, COI and culture Very good referencing An excellent articulation of the status, findings, COI and culture Excellent level of deeper analysis and insight demonstrated Excellent referencing MAA250 Ethics and Financial Services Marking Rubric Assignment 1 Trimester 2, 2018 School of Accounting, Economics and Finance Faculty of Business and Law Deakin University Page 2 of 2 Criteria Unacceptable Needs Improvement Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Part C (Up to 25 marks) 0 7.4 marks 7.5 12.4 marks 12.5 14.9 marks 15.0 17.4 marks 17.5 19.9 marks 20.0 25.0 marks -Communicates a discussion relating to rewards, punishments, recommendations, and impact surrounding the Royal Commission, applying ethical concepts, from a stakeholder perspective GLO2: Communicate to inform Fails to answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Lacks any depth of research Inadequate referencing Some ability to answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Lacks the required depth of research Some but insufficient referencing Satisfactory ability to answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Minimal analysis but with adequate referencing Good knowledge answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Some deeper analysis and insight Good referencing Very good answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Sound deeper analysis Very good referencing An excellent answer in relation to rewards / punishments, proposed outcomes and impact Excellent deeper analysis / insight and referencing Part D (Up to 25 marks) 0 7.4 marks 7.5 12.4 marks 12.5 14.9 marks 15.0 17.4 marks 17.5 19.9 marks 20.0 25.0 marks Ethical behaviour and cross cultural application in relation to overseas / global comparisons to the Australian banking and finance sectors and the interim findings of the Royal Commission GLO8: Global Citizenship (and comparative awareness) Does not know/attempt to analyse and/or discusses diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with no references Struggles to analyse and/or discuss diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with inadequate references Satisfactorily analyses and/or discusses diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with adequate references Good analysis and/or discusses diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with good references Very good analysis and/or discusses diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with very good references Excellent analysis and/or discusses diverse contexts including global cross cultural comparisons and global awareness with excellent references Overall Score out of 100 marks N 0.0 -29.5 N 30.0 49.5 P 50.0 59.5 C 60.0 69.5 D 70.0 79.5 HD 80.0 100.0 The post reasons, background and context surrounding why the Royal Commission was conducted

Pssst…Are you looking for assignment help?

We have experienced native experts to complete any assignment you may have. Plagiarism Free & Great Quality. (Full Refund Provided)

<< SAVE15 >>

Place your first order with code to get 15% discount right away!

Impressive sample results