Some attempt at executive summary,

GSBS6002 Foundations of Business Analysis: Assignment 2 Rubric Name:____________________________________________________ Student ID: __________________________________________ Marking Criteria Weighting Fail (<50) Pass (50-64) Credit (65-74) D (75-84) HD (85-100) Executive Summary 5% Not attempted or insufficient. Some attempt at executive summary, but it does not cover all of report. Executive summary provides a good summary of most of the report. Executive summary provides a clear overview of all areas of the report. Executive summary clearly and concisely explains the research and key recommendations. Introduction 5% Little or no discussion on the background of the case. Some attempt in identifying the background of the case. Introduction provides a limited discussion of the background of the case. Introduction provides a good discussion of the background of the case. Introduction provides a succinct background that places the analysis into context. Research Design 10% Little or no discussion of sampling issues. Some discussion about sampling and ethics, which is limited in scope and depth. Limited use of referencing. Recognises the sampling and data collection techniques used. Supports this discussion with use of references. Correct identification of sampling technique and data collection methods with justification. Demonstrates excellence in identifying and justifying the sampling technique and data collection methods used. The section is well supported with references. Hypothesis development 15% Demonstrates little or no ability to develop hypotheses. In 4 or more instances either the null or alternate hypotheses are not stated or are inappropriate. Hypotheses are not clearly stated. Demonstrates an adequate ability to develop hypotheses. In 2 3 instances, either the null or alternate hypotheses are not stated and/or are inappropriate. Improvement in the wording of hypotheses needed. Demonstrates a sound ability to develop hypotheses. In 1 2 instances either the null or alternate hypotheses are not stated and/or are inappropriate. In most instances hypotheses are clearly articulated. Demonstrates clear competence in developing appropriate hypotheses. In all instances both the null and alternate hypotheses are stated. In most instances hypotheses are clearly articulated. Demonstrates excellence in developing hypotheses. In all instances both the null and alternate hypotheses are stated. All hypotheses are appropriate and clearly articulated. Results, and statistical and non-statistical interpretation 15% Little or no attempt in presenting and interpreting statistical results. Presents statistical results. Demonstrate limited ability in providing statistical and non-statistical interpretation of the results. Displays a sound ability to present statistical result in a manner easily understandable to readers. Demonstrate a good ability to interpret the results that clearly indicates whether the null hypothesis is accepted or rejected. Displays a competent ability to present statistical result in a manner easily understandable to readers. Demonstrate a proficient ability to interpret the results. The interpretation uses statistical terms and clearly indicates whether the null hypothesis is accepted or rejected. Rationale for rejecting/accepting null hypothesis is clearly mentioned. Demonstrate an excellent ability to present statistical result (with a professional quality) which is easily comprehendible by the readers. Demonstrate excellence in interpreting the statistical results. The interpretation uses sufficient statistical terms and clearly indicates whether the null hypothesis is accepted or rejected. Acceptance/rejection of null hypothesis is sufficiently justified. Statistical technique and justification 15% Demonstrates little or no knowledge of statistical methods. No explanation of the strategies adopted. Demonstrates adequate knowledge of statistical methods. Incorrect tests used and limited justification provided for choice of analysis. Demonstrates sound knowledge of statistical methods. In most instances the correct test is identified with some explanation. Demonstrates competent knowledge of statistical methods. Identification and explanation of appropriate analysis is provided in all instances. Deep discussion in most instances, supported with references. Demonstrates excellent knowledge of statistical methods. Correct analysis is used for all five hypotheses and a deep explanation of strategies adopted provided in all instances. Multiple relevant secondary sources used. Analysis and summary of the statistical results 20% Demonstrates little or no ability to synthesise the statistical results or identify key findings. Either draws no conclusion or draws an inappropriate conclusion with a lack of alignment to the preceding information. Demonstrates an adequate ability to analyse and summarise the main findings of the report and/or some findings not discussed. Draws appropriate conclusion, reiterating the main issues. There is consistency with the analysis but could be improved. The conclusion attempts to unify the report. Demonstrates a sound ability to analyse and accurately summarise the main findings of the report. Multiple issues identified. Draws appropriate conclusions and clearly reiterates the main issues. The conclusions are accurate, logical, and consistent with the analysis. The conclusion brings unity to the report. Demonstrates clear competence in analysing and accurately summarising the main findings of the report. Multiple issues identified. Draws appropriate conclusions and clearly reiterates the main issues. The conclusions are accurate, logical, and consistent with the analysis. The conclusion unifies the report successfully. Demonstrates excellence in identifying and accurately summarising the main findings of the report. Multiple issues identified. Draws appropriate strong conclusions and clearly reiterates the main issues. The conclusions are accurate, logical, and consistent with the analysis. The conclusion draws the report into a fully constructive analysis. Recommendations 5% Not attempted Some attempt in providing recommendations that are inconsistent with the key findings. Demonstate a sound ability to provide recommendations. Some of the recommendations are in line with the key findings of the study. Demonstate competent ability to provide recommendations. Most of the recommendations are consistent with the key findings and main purpose of the study. Displays excellence in providing recommendations. All the recommendations are specific, achievable and in line with the key findings and main purpose of the study. Report Structure and Presentation 10% A large number of grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors impede the readers comprehension of the report. No consistent style or structure within findings. Limited evidence of appropriate referencing in-text and/or no reference list. Inadequate grasp and limited use of course terminology. Several spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors are apparent in the report. These mistakes do not interfere with the reports content, comprehension or ease of reading. Findings reflect minimal structural flaws with information organised to convey meaning to the reader. Some in-text referencing errors evident. APA referencing style followed with some errors. Limited use of course terminology and/or minor inaccuracies. A few minor mistakes are evident which in no way detract from the reports content or ease of comprehension. Findings reflect a consistent structure. Information is organised and sequenced to convey the intended meaning to the reader. Appropriate and consisting referencing provided with minimal errors. Both in-text referencing and reference list follow APA style. The extent and use of course terminology is adequate. All sentences are complete with grammar and punctuation correctly applied. Findings are well structured. Findings are logically organised and sequenced to convey the intended meaning to the reader allowing ease of reading. Appropriate and consistent referencing provided with no errors (APA style). Use of course terminology is extensive and largely correct. All sentences are complete and grammatically correct with punctuation correctly applied. Findings are very well structured. Findings are very well organised and easily accessible. Appropriate and consistent referencing provided with no errors (APA style). Extensive use of course terminology in all instances Is correct. Final Mark: _____________/100

Pssst…We can write an original essay just for you.

Any essay type. Any subject. We will even overcome a 6 hour deadline.

<< SAVE15 >>

Place your first order with code to get 15% discount right away!

Impressive sample results