The worst-kept secret in companies has

Assignment Questions Ahead of the curve: The future of performance management The worst-kept secret in companies has long been the fact that the yearly ritual of evaluating (and sometimes rating and ranking) the performance of employees epitomizes the absurdities of corporate life. Managers and staff alike too often view performance management as time consuming, excessively subjective, demotivating, and ultimately unhelpful. In these cases, it does little to improve the performance of employees. It may even undermine their performance as they struggle with ratings, worry about compensation, and try to make sense of performance feedback. These arent new issues, but they have become increasingly blatant as jobs in many businesses have evolved over the past 15 years. More and more positions require employees with deeper expertise, more independent judgment, and better problem-solving skills. They are shouldering ever-greater responsibilities in their interactions with customers and business partners and creating value in ways that industrial-era performance-management systems struggle to identify. Soon enough, a ritual most executives say they dislike will be so outdated that it will resemble trying to conduct modern financial transactions with carrier pigeons. Yet nearly nine out of ten companies around the world continue not only to generate performance scores for employees but also to use them as the basis for compensation decisions. The problem that prevents managers dissatisfaction with the process from actually changing it is uncertainty over what a revamped performance management system ought to look like. If we jettison year-end evaluationswell, then what? Will employees just lean back? Will performance drop? And how will people be paid? Answers are emerging. Companies such as GE and Microsoft, that long epitomized the stack and rank approach have been blowing up their annual systems for rating and evaluating employees and are instead testing new ideas that give them continual feedback and coaching. Netflix no longer measures its people against annual objectives, because its objectives have become more fluid and can change quite rapidly. Google transformed the way it compensates high performers at every level. Some tech companies, such as Atlassian, have automated many evaluation activities that managers elsewhere perform manually. The changes these and other companies are making are new, varied, and, in some instances, experimental. But patterns are beginning to emerge. Some companies are rethinking what constitutes employee performance by focusing specifically on individuals who are a step function Away from averageat either the high or low end of performancerather than trying to differentiate among the bulk of employees in the middle. Many companies are also collecting more objective performance data through systems that automate real-time analyses. Performance data are used less and less as a crude instrument for setting compensation. Indeed, some companies are severing the link between evaluation and compensation, at least for the majority of the workforce, while linking them ever more comprehensively at the high and low ends of Performance. Better data back up a shift in emphasis from backward-looking evaluations to fact-based performance and development discussions, which are becoming frequent and as-needed rather than annual events. How these emerging patterns play out will vary, of course, from company to company. The pace of change will differ, too. Some companies may use multiple approaches to performance management, holding on to hardwired targets for sales teams, say, while shifting other functions or business units to new approaches. But change they must. Eweistein, B. Hancook, B. and Komm, A. (2016) Ahead of the curve: The future of performance management. McKinsey Quarterly[online]. [Accessed 17 July 2018]. Available at https://www.mckinsey.com/businessfunctions/organization/our-insights/ahead-of-the-curve-the-future-ofperformance-management. Assignment Questions Work related assignment Task 1:- 1200 words The report above presents some current issues that require knowledge and application of HR practices. 1. Analyse the importance of labour market analysis and how an understanding of the labour market helps organisations in their recruitment and selection, succession planning and workforce planning in the short and long term. 2. Suggest two strategies that organisations can adopt in the HR functions of recruitment and selection, performance management or reward management to improve their people resourcing and talent management. (Relate this to the scenario provided in the case above on the role of performance management practices in people resourcing and talent management decisions). Your discussion should highlight the key issues, provide examples, relate to the case scenario and use relevant literature to support your report. Task 2: 800 words Reflective Log Reflect on your experience of conducting the assessment centre exercise. How did the exercise address important people resourcing and talent management needs of the organisation? What aspects of the exercise went well? What did not go well? How has the exercise helped you understand how to perform well in a similar exercise in real life? Dont just describe your experience in general, this needs to be analysed together with the related literature. You should focus on the key issues experienced during the assessment meeting rather than just outlining what happened.

Pssst…We can write an original essay just for you.

Any essay type. Any subject. We will even overcome a 6 hour deadline.

<< SAVE15 >>

Place your first order with code to get 15% discount right away!

Impressive sample results