This assignment has two parts therefore

ENG93000 ENG93000-2018-3: Engineering Management for a Sustainable Future S3 2018 Assignment 1 Author Dr Jeremy P. Novak 1 ENG93000 ENG93000-2018-3: Engineering Management for a Sustainable Future Assignment 1 Annotated bibliography and supplementary paragraphs Assignment One Requirements: This assignment has two parts therefore please read each section carefully and address the requirements. Part A: Due Date: Draft Partial annotated bibliography and introduction paragraph 19 November 2018 9:00 AM Length: Search terms, references and approximately 200 to 300 words of introduction Format: Use template Word document only Weighting: 20% deduction of assignment mark 1 if not submitted Submission: Through Turnitin in the Assessment Details section of the unit Black Board site. Referencing Harvard Part B: Due Date: Introduction, full annotated bibliography, answer and conclusion 10 Dec 2018 9:00 AM Length: Approximately2500 words total including introduction, annotated bibliography, an answer to the question and a conclusion Format: Report format Word document only Weighting: 40% of total unit marks Submission: Through Turnitin in the Assessment Details section of the unit Black Board site. Referencing Harvard Assignment One Guiding Question: What does the literature suggest that engineering managers need to do to achieve effective Sustainable Engineering Management practices in your area of specialisation? Note: Please use cover sheets in accordance with standard assignment submission requirements mentioned in the Unit Information Guide. ENG93000 ENG93000-2018-3: Engineering Management for a Sustainable Future S3 2018 Assignment 1 Author Dr Jeremy P. Novak 2 Part A Brief Part A: Draft Partial annotated bibliography and introduction paragraph Due Date: 19 November 2018 9:00 AM Length: Search terms, references and 200 to 300 words of introduction Format: Use template Word document only Weighting: 20% deduction of assignment mark 1 if you do not submitted Submission: Through turn it in the Assessment Details section of the unit Black Board site. Referencing Harvard The aim of the assignment is to build your academic searching skills and to compose an introduction that can be used in the Annotated bibliography (Part B). To do this you will search for 3 appropriate academic journals and 2 popular web sites. The introduction could include a critical analysis of two or three key definitions applicable to the subject of sustainability in engineering. The introduction should be 200 to 300 words in length. Feel free to either use and submit the table provided below or develop your own but please cut and paste this table into a new document. I strongly urge you to read the Guiding information that is provided below. You will have lots of opportunity to do this assessment in the advanced engineering Class that is held each Tuesday. Section 1 Search terms (see notes below) Section 2: Reference in Harvard Format (Export from EndNote or enter manually) Comment (One or two sentences about each important point) Classification 1 e.g. Definition? (Y/N) Classification 2 Classification 3 1 2 3 4 5 Section 3: Introduction paragraph (200 to 300 words long) ENG93000 ENG93000-2018-3: Engineering Management for a Sustainable Future S3 2018 Assignment 1 Author Dr Jeremy P. Novak 3 Guiding information for Part A Experience has shown that the academic skills and integrity of new participants is often unsatisfactory but can be improved significantly via early feedback. Hence this draft assignment submission has been designed as a mechanism for you to obtain specific guidance in relation to your work. Part A is designed to get you to start searching the academic and industry references and provide you feedback to help you in your final assessment submission. Doing Part A will assist you to understand how literature can be used to support your arguments and assertions. There are no marks given for Part A as it is designed to assist you to complete Part B however, failure to submit Part A will result in an automatic 20% deduction for assignment number one. Section 1: Compile relevant search terms and combinations including the associated Boolean logic needed for the completion of the entire Annotated bibliography assignment. As you review each piece of literature, additional search terms may be identified. Add these search terms to the list and indicate (using an in-text citation) where they were first discovered. Section 2: Using EndNote configured to the Harvard referencing style or by typing manually, generate a reference list. In a separate column, alongside reference, make a comment of one or two sentences about each important point. Note, there may be several points about different aspects of that paper each being one or two sentences. Be sure to use quotation marks if a direct quote is made. The Literature Comment table format shown above can be used. Hint: Using Microsoft Excel for this table will enable comments to be easily classified and sorted. For example, comments pertaining to key definitions could be one handy classification category. Section 3: Using relevant literature references, compose an introduction to the annotated bibliography. The introduction must include a critical analysis of two or three key definitions applicable to the subject of engineering for sustainability outcomes. The introduction should be 200 to 300 words in length. ENG93000 ENG93000-2018-3: Engineering Management for a Sustainable Future S3 2018 Assignment 1 Author Dr Jeremy P. Novak 4 Part B Final Assignment Brief Part B: Introduction, full annotated bibliography, answer and conclusion Due Date: 10 Dec 2018 9:00 AM Length: Approximately 2500 words total including introduction, annotated bibliography, an answer to the question and a conclusion Format: Report format Word document only Weighting: 40% of total unit marks Submission: Through Turn-it-in the Assessment Details section of the unit Black Board site. Referencing Harvard You are required to develop a comprehensive annotated bibliography of the Sustainable Engineering Management Body of Knowledge presented in a report format. You need to critically analyse the literature and provide an answer to the below question. What does the literature suggest that engineering managers need to do to achieve effective Sustainable Engineering Management practices in your area of specialisation? In addition to this, you must provide a conclusion. For a suggested report format, please refer to Assignment 1 Annotated bibliography Template.docx. Hint! To build your knowledge in your area of specialisation for example you may be an Electronics Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Civil Engineer, Aerospace Engineer, Asset Manager, and so on refine your search to your area of discipline. In your introduction it is suggested that you make it very clear to the marker that you are focusing your literature review on a specific area of engineering practice. General Guiding information for the Assessments: Start writing early Please ensure that you go and visit the library to get assistance on how to search for academic journals. As discussed in class, you must read widely and deeply Focus on the current peer reviewed literature i.e. 2005 to 2018. Think, for instance about the materials used for production, the energy and other materials consumed in operation, the human resources needed, and where impacts (both positive and negative) from the activities in your practice area will occur. Remember to think about sustainability in engineering when looking for sources and potential impact on environmental, social and economic factors. Please remember that using graphs, tables, charts, and figures enhance content without adding words. Use your imagination and include these items where possible. References, tables, charts and appendices are not included in the word count. Please review the associated marking guide so that you can meet all the requirements. Please ensure that your document is written legibly so that it will be acceptable in an academic and industry context. ENG93000 ENG93000-2018-3: Engineering Management for a Sustainable Future S3 2018 Assignment 1 Author Dr Jeremy P. Novak 5 Please note that failure to meet the minimum appropriate academic references will automatically result in a maximum mark of 40% for the complete assignment as you have not based your literature review in evidence based research. Refer to the links that have been put up on blackboard to assist you. For example the library lib-guides, how to write a report, how to search for academic journals, and so on. ENG93000 ENG93000-2018-3: Engineering Management for a Sustainable Future S3 2018 Assignment 1 Author Dr Jeremy P. Novak 6 Marking Rubric for Assignment 1 (literature review) Excellent 85%100% Very Good 75%84% Good 65%74% Satisfactory 50%64% Unacceptable 0%49% WARNING! If assignment 1 Part A was not submitted there is an automatic 20% of final marks will be deducted. WARNING! failure to meet the minimum academic references will automatically result in a maximum mark of 40% for the complete assignment Response to assigned topic, the understanding of relevant literature, theory, and literature review Structure:: (about 75% of total mark for the assignment) Structure: The Annotated bibliography was very comprehensive and had excellent structure with no errors. The Annotated bibliography was comprehensive and had very good structure with some errors. The Annotated bibliography had good structure and appropriate content but with some errors. The Annotated bibliography consisted of suitable information, had generally suitable structure although some aspects could have been improved The Annotated bibliography did not have suitable structure and information Response to assigned topic: The Annotated bibliography responded directly to the topic and to every separate part of the topic in an exceptionally balanced manner with no irrelevant material. The Annotated bibliography responded directly to the topic and to every separate part of the topic in a balanced manner with minimal irrelevant material. The Annotated bibliography responded directly to the topic and to every separate part of the topic in a reasonably balanced manner, perhaps with a small amount of irrelevant material and some issues not properly developed. Overall the Annotated bibliography responded directly to the topic but with some digressions and irrelevancies. Some aspects of the topic were not developed properly and some less important aspects may have been overlooked. Taken as a whole, the assignment did not respond adequately to the topic. Important aspects were overlooked and/or much of the material was irrelevant. Grasp of core unit theory: The Annotated bibliography demonstrated deep, accurate understanding of unit principles and concepts at a very high level of sophistication. Demonstrated deep, accurate understanding of unit principles and concepts. Demonstrated accurate understanding of unit principles and concepts, although a little superficial or flawed in places. Sound grasp of unit principles and concepts, perhaps one-dimensional and superficial in places and perhaps some misconceptions. One or more important unit concepts or principles seriously misunderstood, or no relevant theoretical framework established. Academic Journals: Annotated bibliography was supported with appropriate peered reviewed academic journals (7 minimum) and other quality sources Annotated bibliography was supported with appropriate peered reviewed academic journals (6 minimum) and other quality sources Annotated bibliography was supported with appropriate peered reviewed academic journals (5 minimum) and other quality sources Annotated bibliography was supported with appropriate peered reviewed academic journals (4 minimum) Annotated bibliography was not supported with the minimum amount of appropriate peered reviewed academic journals Other technical matters (about 25% of total mark for the assignment) Assignment must be in Font 12, 1.5 Spacing, and Times New Roman English expression: Spelling, syntax and grammar completely correct. Spelling, syntax and grammar generally correct although there were two or three minor errors. Spelling, syntax and grammar generally correct although there were more than three minor errors. Spelling, syntax and grammar acceptable but there were frequent minor or serious errors. Unacceptably high number of minor and/or numerous serious errors in spelling, syntax and/or grammar. In-text referencing: Harvard or APA referencing system used with 100% accuracy. Harvard or APA referencing system used with high level of accuracy. Harvard or APA referencing used correctly although with some errors. Harvard or APA referencing used correctly although with some significant errors. No referencing or many serious errors in using Harvard or APA referencing. Reference list: Reference list comprehensive and had no errors. Reference list comprehensive with no omissions but some minor errors. Reference list had one or two omissions and/or significant errors. Reference list had more than two omissions and/or significant errors (but a small number). Reference list had numerous errors and/or omissions (or is missing).

Pssst…We can write an original essay just for you.

Any essay type. Any subject. We will even overcome a 6 hour deadline.

<< SAVE15 >>

Place your first order with code to get 15% discount right away!

Impressive sample results